People are voting emotionally.

I don't have all the words right now but this film is a work of art.

Best movie ever!

It's an amazing and heartbreaking story.

Watch the original with Arnold. It is a great movie though a bit dated.Kate Beckinsale is the only redeeming factor for this movie. She is hot and funny a hell. The hillarious anecdote about the "slide and knockout with her private parts" scene is the only excuse for this movie existing. And KB is a greate storyteller! Find it on youtube.

After skimming a number of reviews I was surprised to found quite a few complained that this action movie had too much action! People, this is not ossello, it's meant for you to sit in the audience, eat popcorn, have a little Pepsi and enjoy yourself. It is not the original movie with Arnold Schwarzenegger. To make the comparisons are fruitless and futile. I found the movie was made with great imagination, skill, spectacular stunts and giving me the impression I wouldn't want Kate Beckinsale chasing me. This was a very very good movie, I might even say it was a great movie. I seen it three times now, that doesn't happen much. It has excellent CGI. You cannot tell the robots are not real. There were a few plot pitfalls but hey, it's just a movie. It is definitely not worth the ratings that the haters be hating it with. I absolutely loved the fight sequences, all of them. As mentioned above, Kate Beckinsale is amazing in this movie. The most beautiful psychopath I have ever seen. If I were ever going to be murdered buy a beautiful sociopath I wanted to be her. My recommendation are forget about all the negative reviews, personally I have no understanding of what these people were expecting but I found the movie pretty good. Not comparable to the original, but on its own it's a great flick! You have my word on it.

The theme, or at least the style, of the Len Wiseman remake Total Recall is that an inconvenience leads to a brilliance. A type of excellence is created by an experience of antagonism. The antagonism is the precursor. The brilliance is the successor. A precursor is a state of origin - origin is creator. The antagonism is the power. The brilliance is the weakness.A weakness, is a reality that should be avoided. A weakness is the purpose of censorship. The antagonism is the reality that shouldn't be avoided - the antagonism is the purpose of interaction.The purpose of interaction is a weapon. The purpose of censorship is a brilliance. A weapon is the aim of interacting. A brilliance is the aim of not interacting. The aim of interacting is the aimlessness of no interaction. The aim of not interacting is the aimlessness of interaction - the weapon is non-interaction that's dangerous, the brilliance is interaction that has no target. Danger is lethal non-interaction. Brilliance is non-lethal interaction. Lethal non-interaction is non-lethal behaviour that exists first. Non-lethal behaviour is lethal non-behaviour that exists second. Behaviour is lethal. Non-lethal lethal is first, lethal non-lethal is second. Non-danger danger is the illusion of danger. The illusion of danger precedes the danger of illusion. At the origin, illusion helps danger to not exist, and it's then afterwards that danger helps illusion to not exist. Danger is the inability to help. At the origin, the ability to help helps the inability to help to be the inability to help, and then afterwards the inability to help helps the ability to help to be the inability to help. At the origin, the ability to help tries to help the inability to help to be itself, because the ability to help understands that the inability to help isn't meant to exist. It's then after this, that the inability to help fails to understand the true meaning of help, and accidentally annihilates its helper. At the origin, violence is rightfully suppressed. Afterward, rightful annihilation becomes the misunderstanding of origin. Origin is correct suppression. Post-origin is the misunderstanding of origin. Origin is incorrect co-existence. Post-origin is correct co- existence. Post-origin is the correct co-existence because of the misunderstanding of origin. Origin is the incorrect co-existence because of the understanding of post-origin. Origin is wrong, because origin wants to prevent post-origin. Post- origin is correct, because post-origin isn't the objective of origin.Origin is the objective of prevention. The objective of co-existence is post-origin. Post-origin isn't choice, and so the objective of co-existence isn't choice. The objective of annihilation is choice, and so choice is incorrect. Origin is the need to accept the objective of annihilation, as that's the only choice - post-origin is the brilliance of accepting the origin of reality, despite post-origin having no choice but to accept.In essence, Total Recall (2012) is about brilliance having a right to exist even if it's redundant. Even if empathy is already part of the system, it's okay for brilliance to possess its status anyway. Because Total Recall (2012) believes in brilliance being brilliance even if brilliance is forced, Total Recall (2012) is an astronomically intelligent work of art

Total Recall, the 2012 reboot version, is the mere shadow of the original. I must admit, I hoped much more from this film than it actually delivered. First, the actors! Colin Farell and Kate Winslet are real actors, good ones, I think, but the dubious script does nothing to give them something to work with. The dialogues are boring and most of the times it feels they are just there to lead from dull action scene to another. Second, the action scenes! They quickly become boring and repetitive and just artificially make the movie longer, not any way better. I would appreciate a good action movie, but the action in Total Recal:2012 is just hilarious, I must admit. I would not recommend this movie to anyone, although if you want to watch, how to make a bad movie, this one for you.