Nice effects though.

It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.

This is a dark and sometimes deeply uncomfortable drama

Another odd choice for this director (by the way, the English title makes no sense – much better is the alternate SCOUNDREL IN WHITE), an eccentric character comedy that generally misses the (dubious) mark but is redeemed by a thriller-type twist in the last half-hour which turns it into a Chabrol movie after all! Apparently, he intended it as a disservice to leading man Jean-Paul Belmondo since his own meticulously-crafted films were pretty much ignored by audiences whereas they would indiscriminately lap up anything the star chose to turn his hand to! Although I had disliked its theatrical trailer – that I caught when I rented a Belmondo DVD collection a couple of years ago – I decided to acquire it regardless as part of my ongoing comprehensive tribute dedicated to its director. Incidentally, I had to watch this in French without the benefit of subtitles – since my only other option was an Italian-dubbed version with superimposed Russian narration! Anyway, Belmondo (roguish as ever) makes a bet with a number of his card-playing pals that he can hitch up with the least attractive woman around. Meeting up a year later, many of them produce photos of their 'conquests' but, obviously, our hero makes off with the prize money – which he opts to spend vacationing in Tunisia where, running into mousy Mia Farrow (sporting buck-teeth, glasses and a leg-brace!), Belmondo decides to keep up the game! For the record, I had seen both Chabrol (presenting his latest film THE BRIDESMAID) and Farrow (introducing Giuseppe De Santis' neo-realist disaster movie ROMA ORE 11 [1952]) at the 61st Venice Film Festival in September 2004.But to get back to the film under review: Belmondo and Farrow marry and he takes a job at her eminent father's clinic (the protagonist happens to be a medical student) but, then, her luscious sister – Laura Antonelli – turns up. Obviously smitten with her, Belmondo drugs his wife in order to spend the nights with the younger woman and even Fate lends him a helping hand when the latter's husbands expire repeatedly in freak accidents (the first, involving a tractor, is especially hilarious).So far, so mediocre – or, at least, not particularly rewarding apart from Pierre Jansen's jaunty score. What is doubly disappointing here is that, in spite of the handiwork of Chabrol's long-time screen writing collaborator Paul Gegauff (a notoriously misogynist individual), the film does not have the courage of its intriguing convictions and makes commercial compromises by nevertheless peppering the whole with beautiful girls like Farrow, Antonelli and Marlene Appelt (as Belmondo's luscious nurse)…not to mention that afore-mentioned surprise ending that comes totally out of left field! In fact, Farrow's character is revealed to be not quite as naïve as her hubby (and the audience) had been led to believe as she smoothly turns the tables on Belmondo (with the help of a doctor – her lover, played by Daniel Ivernel – who, until then, had been our hero's best friend!). Here, too, we realize that the car accident which had opened the film was merely the first step in the protagonist's systematic emasculation. Speaking of Ivernel, he is perhaps best known for his appearance in Luis Bunuel's 1964 version of DIARY OF A CHAMBERMAID which, incidentally, also features repressed bourgeois Michel Piccoli getting it on with his frumpy maid Muni! By the way, at the same time that Chabrol was involved in this occasionally amusing but ultimately thankless movie, his wife Stephane Audran's career was reaching its non-Chabrolian zenith via her participation in Bunuel's THE DISCREET CHARM OF THE BOURGEOISIE (1972)!

I've watched this film about thirty years ago and it stuck in my mind until now. When I came across it on DVD, I didn't hesitate too long, even more, because I have a predilection for early Belmondo flicks. But what a bad surprise! Some movies should be allowed to resign from public exposure, to preserve a certain memory, and not to shock audiences.Widely hailed as one of Chabrol's rare cynic works, the only lasting impression I got from re- watching it is... boredom. Some movies really do not age in style. But what about movies which didn't have any sense of style at all?The flaws in the script, uninspired acting - presumably due to the lack of direction -, a sort of production design, which doesn't deserve its name, less than mediocre photography and, last but not least, the worst editing job I've seen in ages, make this one truly hard to stand.My impression was, that there was a bunch of people with too much money and equipment but obviously, no idea or any skills at all. It really comes as a surprise, that this one didn't abruptly end Chabrol's career. Don't blame it on the overall bad taste of the 70s, this one is crap in its own right and a worthy contender for the most useless waste of celluloid ever.

At the time ,Chabrol was producing movies at an alarming speed .And that period is still looked upon as his very best:"la femme infidèle" "le boucher" "que la bête meure" "la rupture" and "les noces rouges" are unqualified musts for any Chabrol fan.Two works took a divergent road in this golden era: "la decade prodigieuse " was a failed (but not completely wretched) attempt at transferring one of Ellery Queen's absorbing books to the screen .And then "Docteur Popaul" which is from Hubert Monteilhet's "meurtres à loisirs" .Monteilhet writes thrillers which sometimes recall Boileau-Narcejac ("Diabolique" "Vertigo" )but he introduces a sense of humor and a certain bad taste not present in the works of the writers I mention above.Chabrol has given a totally true rendering of Monteilhet atmosphere:the set up,the grotesque characters (particularly a made look ugly Mia Farrow :why her anyway?The director had to dub her in French ).The conclusion ,like in any Monteilhet's book, is immoral to a fault.But deliciously immoral.

A delightful black comedy which is quite unlikely ever to be re-made by Hollywood, it is just too cynical about beauty and love and marriage and family and medicine and murder. Jean-Paul Belmondo plays the title hero, ever in pursuit of ugly women (which incidentally furthers his career) until the sight of his sister-in-law, played by Laura Antonelli, make him change his priorities. It is amazing how Belmondo manages to stay likable while his character's actions are thoroughly objectionable throughout - it probably helps that his adversaries are not such terrific people themselves.