Woody Woodpecker enters a turf war with a big city lawyer wanting to tear down his home in an effort to build a house to flip.
Similar titles
You May Also Like
Reviews
Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!
I don't have all the words right now but this film is a work of art.
For all the hype it got I was expecting a lot more!
The film never slows down or bores, plunging from one harrowing sequence to the next.
It was an utter confusion and disappointment. Supposed to be a kids' movie and I found many things wrong here. Actors were sluggish and unemotional, they barely show woody and there are many question marks. Unrealistic with many changes. My kiddo didn't like it at all and I kept waiting for it to get better until I had to switch it off.
....then as an adult, would i? she watched it for 10 minutes and she picked up her Lego toys,started playing with it,completely ignorant of the movie. sheesshhhh!!!!
It's because it stinks. The acting stinks (Tim Omundson manages to be somewhat ok, but his character is empty and moronic). The music stinks. Woody Woodpecker's character and voicer is annoying, vapid, and obnoxious. Everything and everyone is see through and one dimensional. Universal was like,what's the crappiest thing we can do with a beloved character? Oh I know, let's butcher it with lazy writing and worse production. Good grief it stinks.
I have no idea why the writers found it necessary to start the movie with a broken family plot. Rich dad divorces mom and hooks up with younger sex object who needs a "Xanny" at one point. Why?! Dad is forced to take kid along on a vacation which really is dad trying to build a mansion in the forest. I think a key aspect of writing for kids is that the writers have kids. Are we targeting ages 4 - 7? 8 to 10? up to 12 years old (because they won't believe a woodpecker drummed on soup cans to produce Jon Bonham-esque sound).I feel sorry for anyone who had any role in this project, but mostly anyone who decided to watch it.Why? Just why.